All Posts

Agile vs. Waterfall (Part 3 of 6). Cost, Functionality and Time

 

Part 1: What is a Waterfall methodology?

Part 2: What is an Agile methodology?

Cost, functionality and time

Like any human undertaking, projects need to be performed and delivered under certain constraints. Traditionally, these constraints have been listed as cost, functionality and time/scope. These are also referred to as the Project Management Triangle (PMT), where each side represents a constraint. One side of the triangle cannot be changed without affecting the others. This relationship is illustrated below.

image

The PM triangle

The time/schedule constraint refers to the amount of time available to complete a project. The cost constraint refers to the budgeted amount available for the project. The functional/scope constraint refers to what must be done to produce the project's end result. These three constraints are often competing constraints: increased functionality typically means increased time and increased cost, a tight time constraint could mean increased costs and reduced scope, and a tight budget could mean increased time and reduced scope.

Depending what type of company/project you are working for/on two of these will be more important than the third. If it is a fixed price project cost is a constraint that cannot be changed. In that case, either functionality or time will be the one that suffers.

In other words you have three options:

  • Develop a product quickly with high quality or much functionality, but then it will not be low cost
  • Develop a product quickly and with a low cost, but then it will not be of high quality or have much functionality
  • Develop a product with high quality or much functionality and with a low cost, but then it will take a relatively long time

Quality is not a part of the PMT, but it is the ultimate objective of every delivery. Hence, the PMT implies quality.

Many project managers are under the notion that 'high quality comes with high cost', which to some extent is true, unless amount of functionality is the parameter that suffers. In all cases, using low quality resources to accomplish project deadlines often does not lead to success of the overall project.

Like with the scope, quality will also be an important deliverable for the project.

In agile functionality or cost are usually the ones that suffer. Time is usually less of a factor because iterations continue until the team/project/customer believes the product is ready to be released. It is more about continuously getting functionality out the door so the project can stop at any time and still have a working product.

Part 4: Pros and cons of choosing Waterfall

Dennis Kayser
ABOUT THE AUTHOR | Dennis Kayser
My name is Dennis Kayser and I’m CEO and co-founder in Forecast. I enjoy helping our customers succeed by building great and innovative software that supports teams in their daily work.
Recent Posts

Buffer Post

This post has been published.

Read more

Smart Template for Your Statement of Work

Building your Statement of Work is the foundation for the rest of your project. It's also the sales proposal, or at least it should be, since it will ...

Read more

Forecast is Nominated for the Nordic Startup Awards 2018

We're honored! Honored to be elected as a nominee for the Nordic Startup Awards 2018 in the category, Best AI/Machine Learning Startup. 🙌 Many great ...

Read more

9 Steps to Plan Your Way Out of Scope Creep

Scope creep, one of the real challenges when managing a project. Often it hits you with a sneak attack, and before you know if it, your project is off...

Read more